🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the Britain, and it feels like it’s time for a rethink. Over the years, an celebration that began as a commemorative event of the past, cultural identity and bonds between Black populations worldwide, has developed a business-like atmosphere, expanding to include functions where African descendants are paid to talk to predominantly white listeners about hidden biases and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade generated a rise in the industry of displaying cultural sensitivity. Yet, that phase is now over. The wave has crested, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what promoting consciousness is for.

The History of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with a week of commemoration and observance in the middle of February. Black History Month grew out of this movement and was publicly established in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the North America in the second month, but also in October in the Britain, Germany, Éire and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The month has evolved since that time, placing less emphasis on the accounts of the slave trade across the Atlantic and civil rights battles, and increasingly on prominent Black figures in government, the arts, and social movements, and broadly celebrating the impact Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the manner the month is commemorated is a indication of the current political situation. How it progresses is a valuable example in how appropriation leads to weakening: the transformation of Black History Month has hindered the purpose of it, which is to address embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how important it is to reconsider Black History Month more than the particular moment in which it takes place this year. In the Britain, a reemerging right-wing in the form of the Reform political group is leading the polls. In the warmer months we witnessed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in the UK's past. the Conservative leader, the African descendant in charge of the right-wing political group, is a firm opponent of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a place where a elected representative feels emboldened to declare that “not seeing any white faces” in certain urban areas is a reason for concern. At the same time, extreme conservative groups are growing in the EU as a entirety.

In the America, a massive attack against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been taken, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the top legal institutions of the nation. A effort to erase Black history and experience from the records is in progress. One of Donald Trump's initial presidential directives focused on the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the prestigious establishment, accusing them of a “concerted and widespread effort to alter the country's historical narrative” by portraying America “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Given these circumstances, the month illustrates how insufficiently it can be impactful if it is restricted to either dutiful corporate observances, or depoliticized festivities of contributions in the past, rather than addressing the conditions of the present. It also demonstrates how its limited duration means that it is disconnected from the wider consistent effort that is required. An academic expert, a prof at a learning establishment, put it best when she voiced worries about the fleeting superficial actions of the celebration. “The difficulty with embracing a superficial method”, she wrote, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month turns into a fleeting performance rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Establishing how to adjust, modify and expand actions for equal rights and acknowledgment in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a treacherous thing. There is a urge to just do away with observances such as Black History Month completely, believing they are simply not fit for purpose, or are relics of an era that has not worked.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and tradition of racial movements – local anti-racism groups, inclusion and equity efforts, and yes, even those talks to businesses – constitute an foundation that a lot of work has been dedicated to. It is there not merely to decline as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month appear as? Firstly, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is spread out throughout the annual calendar (as certain organizations are already starting to implement), parts of its content (particularly around historic Black characters) incorporated into academic syllabi. It would also be a era that does not shy away from political issues, and leaves space for people, particularly the younger generation, to express their concerns and stories. What value has simple recognition of the past when it doesn’t reckon with the contemporary truth of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the urban areas? Institutions who observe it should not be comforted with the passive language of implicit prejudice and alertness to subtle slights, but challenged by the risks that affect everyone if fight against prejudice is not treated with importance. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, urgent, and responsive. It could be that an entire name rebrand is necessary – Contemporary Black History Month.